The photographer collaborated with the designer of hats, it turned out an elegant series

The Dutch photographer Jeroen Adema (Jeroen Adema) made a series of art shots in collaboration with the designer of hats. Here’s what he says:

The photographer collaborated with the designer of hats, it turned out an elegant series

“I believe in the power of cooperation. Around so many talented people, it’s just incredible. In the city where I live, designer Van Nuijen (VanNuyen). She creates exclusive hats, and these are the most beautiful hats I’ve ever seen. She is an amazingly talented woman, and for a couple of years I really wanted to arrange a photo session with her hats.

The photographer collaborated with the designer of hats, it turned out an elegant series

The photographer collaborated with the designer of hats, it turned out an elegant series

Finally, in October 2017, we sat down and together discussed what and how we would like to photograph. Van Nuijen is not only a designer of hats, she is also a hairdresser-stylist, so we thought what hair styles would suit the hats. I asked a friend who works in a clothing store to borrow a few outfits for shooting, and also offered to take part in the project to his relative, a make-up artist. Finally, I asked two more women who live in our city to work as models for our project. In short, everyone agreed, and here’s the result! I’m really proud of our joint project! “

The photographer collaborated with the designer of hats, it turned out an elegant series

The photographer collaborated with the designer of hats, it turned out an elegant series

The photographer collaborated with the designer of hats, it turned out an elegant series

With some regret, I note that although eight shots are presented, only four hats are used on them, each photographed from two angles. Not enough! And the project is quite interesting, in my opinion. And I totally agree with Yerun – when enthusiastic people cooperate, their talents are not just formed, but multiplied, and amicable joint efforts can lead to remarkable results. Synergy, it is the most.

The photographer collaborated with the designer of hats, it turned out an elegant series

The photographer collaborated with the designer of hats, it turned out an elegant series

The photographer’s account in Instagram: Jeroen Adema

Pictures of the day: May 30, 2018, Wednesday

Pictures of the day: May 30, 2018, Wednesday

A severe storm hit Germany. Part of the areas are flooded, a strong wind tore roofs from houses, felled trees and road signs. Most affected Hesse and North Rhine-Westphalia

Pictures of the day: May 30, 2018, Wednesday

Deadly for the human body, the poison arsenic may well be a panacea for the treatment of malignant tumors. This conclusion was reached by scientists at the Northwestern University of the United States, having conducted a series of laboratory studies on animals.

American experts have found that in low doses, the toxicant trioxide contributes to the remission of one of the varieties of blood cancer and is able even at a fairly neglected stage to destroy the cancer cells of promyelocytic leukemia.

Having created particles with an arsenic compound – “nanobins” of a spherical shape, scientists have discovered that when they enter the blood they reach the tumor cells where they accumulate and release a poison that destroys malignant cells. At the same time he does not violate any other functions and, without harming his health, is eliminated from the body by natural means, the TV channel "360".

“Tumors begin to collect nanobins, accumulating them. Cancer cells are in a more acidic environment, unlike healthy ones. This acid helps to dissolve arsenic particles inside the nanobins, releasing the active substance, “- said one of the authors of the study, Tom O’Halloran.

However, that’s not all. In passing, American experts have found that arsenic effectively kill the cells of breast cancer, ovaries and lungs, the website “Dni.ru.”

“Tosno” – “Dynamo”. Boyarsky came to the match in the scarf of the Tosnenians

Famous actor, fan of “Zenith” Mikhail Boyarsky is present at the match of the 29th round of the Russian championship between “Tosno” and “Dynamo” (0: 0, first half).

Boyarsky got into television with the scarf of the Tosnensky club.

Earlier, Boyarsky said that it would be better to root for Tosno if Zenit did not qualify for the Champions League. Tosnensy invited him to a match with Dynamo.

Sports.ru holds text online broadcast this match.

"Tosno" - "Dynamo". Boyarsky came to the match in the scarf of the Tosnenians

Yandex.Direct

Video: Light show in China using 1,374 drones

The city authorities paid about $ 1.6 million for organizing the show.

Video: Light show in China using 1,374 drones

The other day Ehang set a new world record, simultaneously raising to air 1,374 drones. Light show was held in the Chinese city of Xi’an: UAVs climbed to a height of 260 meters and were built in such a way as to create various inscriptions and images in the sky. As writes South China Morning Post, despite the fact that part of the show was, as planned, in the end, some figures could not be built yet. The reasons for failure in Ehang promise to be revealed in the next few days.

American politician sent a gun to his daughter’s boyfriend in a campaign video

American politician Brian Kemp released an agitational video in which he talked with his daughter’s boyfriend, pointing his gun at him, writes Washington Post. In a two-minute video, the acting secretary of the state of Georgia sits in a room decorated with various weapons. “I’m Brian Kemp, and this is Jake – a young man who is interested in one of my daughters,” says the politician, pointing to the young man sitting next to him.

During the conversation Kemp asked the teenager what is required of the young man who wants to meet with his daughter, and he replied: “Respect and good attitude towards the Second Amendment to the Constitution, sir.” The answer liked the policy. “It seems that we will get along,” concludes Kemp.

The video quickly began to gain popularity and became the reason for criticism of the politician in social networks. Some of the users reproached Kemp for directing the gun to the young man, while others criticized his position on the issue of storing weapons. After a while, Kemp published a response to criticism: “Guys, I’m a conservative. Resign yourself to this. “

“Locomotive” – ​​”Zenith”. The hosts will play in a gray-red uniform

It became known, in what form today will play “Locomotive” and “Zenith”.

Muscovites decided to go on the field in a gray-red form (black at the goalkeeper), the guests will play in their traditional azure with blue (goalkeeper – in green).

Note that in the first match in St. Petersburg “Lokomotiv” played in white form.

Sports.ru will conduct an online broadcast of this match. The beginning is at 16.30 Moscow time.

"Locomotive" - ​​"Zenith". The hosts will play in a gray-red uniformPhoto: telegram channel “Zenith”

Who is what # 2. Boots that can not be missed

New Mercurial and Predator, as well as old and new Adidas boots in the new release.

Who is what # 2. Boots that can not be missed

Marco Asenio already went out in such boots for a match against Bavaria, on the weekend he also played in the prototype boots 2010.

Who is what # 2. Boots that can not be missed

The next generation X 18 was in the spotlight last weekend. These boots we saw only during training. Smolnikov became the first player to show a novelty in the game. These boots will go on sale before the World Championship.

Who is what # 2. Boots that can not be missed

Defender of the PSG Presnel Kimpembe is the only ambansador of the adidas Glitch series in France. Presnel was chosen for the Parisian line of boots. It was in Glitch for Paris from the collection “Sol Pack” that he went to the games this weekend.

Who is what # 2. Boots that can not be missed

Adrian Mezheevsky noted the original choice, playing in one match at once in two different Nike Tiempo Legend 6. Adrian started the game in gold boots “Tech Craft”. But during the match he had to change the boot on his right foot.

Who is what # 2. Boots that can not be missed

This week Kilian Mbappa was another ambassador Nike, who came out in boots from the collection of Mercurial Heritage. PSG player played in the prototype Nike Mercurial 1998. It was in these boots Ronaldo played at the World Championships in France.

Who is what # 2. Boots that can not be missed

Federico Chiesa became another player who went on the game in boots from the Mercurial Heritage. Federico played in the colors of 2006 and helped his team to defeat Napoli.

Who is what # 2. Boots that can not be missed

In Sunday’s match against Manchester United, the young player of Arsenal came in the starting lineup. Nelson is one of the few adidas in the UK that will be wearing Glitch this season, and this time it was released in the new version of Glitch for London from the Haze Pack collection.

Who is what # 2. Boots that can not be missed

Last week, the third personal collection of clothes by Paul Pogba was released. Its main attribute was the boots adidas Predator 18+. It was in them that Paul entered the field in the game against Arsenal and scored a goal there.

Who is what # 2. Boots that can not be missed

In the last weekend, the original boots marked the player of the Japanese Gamba Osaka Mateus. Almost all the adidas Predator amadadors played in boots from the collection “Deadly Strike”. The Brazilian also came out in boots from the pack “Nite Crawler”.

Who is what # 2. Boots that can not be missed

Last week, Nick Powell returned to the selection of September 2011, when he went on the field in the Adidas F50 adizero boots “High Energy / Electricity ». In this match Wigan took another step towards winning the title of English League 1.

Who is what # 2. Boots that can not be missed

In the match, which was the opening of the stadium for Los Angeles FC, Stephen Beitashur came out in the old adidas 11Pro Crazylight boots, which were released in October 2014. The first home game the hosts finished with a victory over Seattle Saunders with a score of 1-0.

Who is what # 2. Boots that can not be missed

Leroy Sane came out in the new NikeiD Mercurial Vapor 360 boots from the Mercurial Heritage collection last Sunday. Sané played in the prototype of 2014.

Past Issues:

Who is what # 1

Put a plus and subscribe if you liked this heading. Follow the links and subscribe to us in other social networks.

We are at other venues: VK / Instagram / Web

Yuri Gavrilov – 65!

Yuri Gavrilov - 65!Today his 65th birthday is celebrated by the legendary midfielder of “Spartak” 70-80’s

Yuri Gavrilov.

Yuri Vasilievich played for our team from 1977 to 1985, played 347 games and scored 115 goals, was the best scorer of the championship in 1983 and became the red-white champion of the USSR in 1979, won five silver medals, played for the national team of the country, participated in the World Championships – 1982.

But millions of football fans Gavrilov was remembered above all as a unique dispatcher, an unrivaled master of the last pass. His programs were timely, perfectly accurate, elegant, original, unexpected for competitors and comfortable for partners.

Bundles Gavrilov – Yartsev and Gavrilov – Rodionov are considered in the domestic football benchmark. A significant part of their heads forwards, “Spartacus” was scored precisely with the broadcasts of today’s jubilee.

Konstantin Ivanovich Beskov, who invited Gavrilov to “Spartak”, called him a born raspasovschikom, and the phrase of the great coach “If you do not know what to do with the ball – give it to Gavrilov” went down in history.

FC “Spartak Moscow” sincerely congratulates Yuri Vasilyevich on his jubilee, wishes him good health, happiness, prosperity and victories of his beloved team!

Yuri Gavrilov - 65!

Yuri Gavrilov - 65!

Yuri Gavrilov - 65!

Yuri Gavrilov - 65!

Yuri Gavrilov - 65!

Icebreakers festival opens in St. Petersburg

Icebreakers festival opens in St. PetersburgFestival of icebreakers in St. Petersburg. Photo: Moika78 / Valentin Egorshin

In St. Petersburg, the fifth, jubilee, icebreaker festival was opened. Guests will see six "giants".

Petersburgers will be shown not only the legendary "Krasin". He was joined by five courts: "Novorossiysk", "St. Petersburg", "Ivan Krusenstern", "Nevskaya Zastava" and "Mudyug".

Icebreakers festival opens in St. Petersburg

Moika78 / Valentin Egorshin

You can see the ships from the Lieutenant Schmidt quay or the English quay.

In the evening in the water area of ​​the Neva will be a parade of icebreakers.

In total, St. Petersburg will have two days to see the icebreakers.

As I wrote "Moika78", the St. Petersburg Festival topped the top festive events in the country. It is he who attracts tourists to the northern capital so much at the May holidays.

Can the author of the photograph be the one who did not shoot it

The photographer gave the camera a monkey. She took a picture. The photographer had to defend him in court. The ridiculous story would not have turned into a news series, if it had not served as the basis for an important judicial precedent determining whether the author of a work of someone who in fact is not the author can be considered.

In 2011, photographer David Slater shot baboons in the reserve in Indonesia. He left his cell, and the monkey, nicknamed Naruto, made a few selfies on her, one of which the photographer gave to the agency.

When in three years the picture appeared on the Wikimedia website, Slater asked to remove it, referring to the copyright. However, the US Copyright Office then sided with Wikimedia: although the camera and the idea of ​​filming belonged to Slater, technically the baboon has removed itself, and work created by nature, an animal or a plant can not be registered as someone else’s property.

Can the author of the photograph be the one who did not shoot it© David J Slater / Wildlife Personalities Ltd (UK)

When the case was widely publicized, PETA intervened. The Organization for the Protection of Animal Rights tried to defend the right of the monkey to a picture in the District Court of San Francisco. But Judge William Orrik was adamant: “I just do not understand how this law can be applied to monkeys,” the judge said.

During four years of the court hearings, the parties ascertained how close the relationship was to PETA with the animal in order to represent it in court; whether primacy can dispose of funds if it is recognized by the author of the snapshot; and, finally, who is the author of the photo – the one who came up with the idea, or someone who physically pressed the shutter button.

At some point, Slater went to the world and agreed to deduct 25% of the fees for the snapshot to protect the habitat of the monkeys. But the court decided to bring the matter to an end. In his final decision, he ruled that the monkey, as well as other animals, can not even file lawsuits.

At the end of this story, the editors decided to ask the opinion of photographers whether the person who did not press the camera button could be considered the author of the photo. Opinions were divided.

Can the author of the photograph be the one who did not shoot itVitya Lyagushkin

There’s nothing to talk about. Of course, the author of the picture, the owner of all rights and money for him is the photographer David Slater – it’s his intellectual property and no one else’s draw. He is the author of the idea, this is his camera and his memory card. Roughly speaking, he loaded it and gave it to the baboon. Who clicked, in fact, is not so important.

In my practice there were a lot of cases when I was preparing a survey, but physically I could not press the button due to the peculiarities of the project. But from this work did not cease to be mine. Under water, octopuses often press the shutter release button when they are allowed to play with the box – no one considers them to be photographers.

Zoo advocates wanted to create a precedent, on the basis of which animals could be considered copyright holders. The controversial issue is how much PETA can generally represent the interests of the animal in court, but most importantly – while animals have no reason to claim authorship.

Can the author of the photograph be the one who did not shoot itArtem Chernov

Orangutan has the unquestionable right to see its name indicated under the photograph.

After reading this story, I immediately remembered the attitude to the rights to the picture in Nezavisimaya Gazeta, where I worked as a photocor. Her lawyer believed this: if the photo was taken on an editorial camera, the property rights to it belong to the newspaper and only to the newspaper.

Of course, lawyers share property and copyright – authorship always belongs to the one who removes. Orangutan has the unquestionable right to see its name indicated under the photograph. This is certain.

And as for property rights, it seems to me that human reason, generosity, respect for animals and a sense of humor should be a priority. After all, all these rights, like money, are purely human games, in which monkeys can not play. Hence, we ourselves need to decide how we thank the monkeys for participating in these games. But it is hardly possible to legislate for photographers to have a sense of humor or gratitude – the choice is purely human, and the court is almost powerless.

Can the author of the photograph be the one who did not shoot itDenis Sinyakov

Once Boris Yeltsin at the meeting asked for a camera from Sergei Chirikov …

A funny case. He shows that any legislation is imperfect and that not all processes occurring in the life of society can be described by the dry language of jurisprudence.

Once Boris Yeltsin at the meeting asked for a camera from Sergei Chirikov, photographer of the EPA, covering this event. Sergei did not agree, but who would be the author of the picture, whether he is more accommodating – Yeltsin or Chirikov? Of course, Yeltsin. What then is the baboon not the author?

Can the author of the photograph be the one who did not shoot itOleg Klimov

David Slater can claim to be a monkey editor.

From the point of view of any photographer, the authorship belongs to the monkey Naruto: David Slater had no intentions and instructions on what and how the monkey will shoot. On the contrary, the trick was that the author of this photo should find his own story and composition. The monkey made a copyright self. Well done!

Of course, David Slater can claim to be a monkey editor – but not the author of this picture. He acted as an editor, choosing this photo from many others.

However, in this logic there is one ethical problem: we automatically extrapolate our thoughts to all other photographers, to put it mildly, comparing them with monkeys. At least, this is exactly what concerns the selfie photographers, who are now the absolute majority. If I lived in America and the American court recognized the copyright for a snapshot of a monkey, in place of David Slater I would file a counterclaim for insults to the photographer’s profession. But I live in Russia – in a country where everything belongs to the people.

Can the author of the photograph be the one who did not shoot it

It does not matter if the frame is made by you or you give the camera to someone else.

The situation itself seems ridiculous to me, and the behavior of the PETA organization is rather stupid. After all, in modern art use any media and a variety of ways to submit ideas. Photography is no exception. It can be used as a language, and it does not matter at all whether the frame is made by you or you will let someone else take a picture.

I often photograph myself, and sometimes I ask my wife about it. But I can not say that she becomes the author of the picture, even if she presses the shutter button. A snapshot is part of a whole project, the author of which is still me, because the idea and idea belong to me.

Here is the same situation, but it looks much more stupid: the monkey can not be considered the author of the picture, if only because it can not continue to work with the picture. The author had an idea, he performed it, it turned out interesting.

Can the author of the photograph be the one who did not shoot it

In the matter of copyrights, the Ukrainian photographer is below the monkey.

The situation is ridiculous, but it shows how carefully copyright is kept in the West. In Ukraine, it has not even reached the point of upholding the rights of photographers to their own shots. Attempts to defend their rights in court cause a mocking reaction – in view of the deliberate failure of such schemes. In general, in the matter of copyrights, the Ukrainian photographer is now below the monkey.

But seriously, it seems from the outside that the Americans have once again started this business with boredom. Many famous photographers built their projects on the fact that they gave the camera to representatives of different subcultures or classes, the same homeless, and they pressed the button. Pictures still belong to the bearer of the idea.

Can the author of the photograph be the one who did not shoot it

Igor Mukhin

All this reminds numerous law firms that react to the most stupid news.

… In Iraq, unknown people kidnapped the deputy head of the Olympic Committee. Police in Mexico detained five suspects in shooting for schoolchildren. Russia faced a massive failure YouTube. Viber reported problems due to the Telegram lock. The eight-year-old boy told about the shelters of the orphanage, who dipped his head in the toilet.

The case of the monkey – a network series, lasting for several years. Most of all in this story, interested in the Twitter president of the Fund for the protection of animal rights. He teaches chemistry and law, has been conducting public twitter since 2017; all this is reminiscent of numerous law firms that react to the most stupid news, find news heroes, are judged to win business – that’s what they live for.